Category: Uncategorized

Law 1: Extension of old one

Meaning new dimension in poetry comes either after knowledge from the primitive or ancient one which is an extension of old one.

Law 2b: Follow your thoughts not mind reading

Poetic skill takes a giant-leap when we follow thoughts instead of mind reading.

Law 2a: Inability to choose a tool though the object is fit enough for the thesis.

There is no crystal clear tool to write a poetry which is the thesis or object to be implemented in writing. The tool here refers to the knowledge and skill which we acquired together with the imagination.

Law 3a: Work against work

Poetry written by William Shakespeare and poetry also by William Wordsworth. It is very evident that Wordsworth works came into existence after Shakespeare’s which is “ work against work”

Law 3b: Work inside work

Works created by Shakespeare alone satisfies work inside work. Following statement is not a paradox. “Shakespeare invented 1700 new words”. Those vocabularies were implemented or adopted by other poets who came after him. Meaning new words are new works. Hence the re-usage of those words in different poems by different poets is a work against work. Again if the invented vocabulary is used in a different poem by Shakespeare himself. Meaning it is “work inside work”.

Law 4: Dirty subject and eternal discovery get coagulated to new prototype which mattered mostly and hence the disappearance of the respective subject.

Shakespeare is a dirty subject and his poetry work is a new prototype which mattered mostly and hence the disappearance of the respective subject. Here the subject is Shakespeare.

Law 5: Manmade objects are none in the space. All are change of form to another or a new reason can be stated irrespective of etc

Again very true. Not even a grain of sand can be created from nowhere. Therefore manmade objects are none in the space. It is just out of probabilities or possibilities, new objects are converted. Rather I would say transformed.

Law 6: Nothing is essential, all matter and their properties are intertwined and so it is never ending.

Sonnet is a matter, each and every line in a sonnet are properties. Sonnet defined as fourteen lines. Sonnet and each and every line are intertwined.

Law 7: Birth of space or there is nothing called ageing god.

i).Here space refers to a poem .ii). Other words poem is also part of space. Going by i).space is made out of poems meaning all are confined in a poem. Meaning poem alone exists in space. In other words space may be treated as a misnomer and so can be replaced as “poem”. Going by ii).space includes earth, sun, galaxy, comets, trees, fruits, meaning poems, novels incandescent lamb or bulb , petrol are also part of space.

So coming to law 7, space, poem, calculus, heart, brain, President of America can all be born. Now the hypotheses which I am going to take is they all belong to space and so, of which they are transformed or decayed. My conclusion over here is “birth of space “is an unidentified one as per inversely converse or in other words there is nothing called ageing god. Here god is poem. Poem comes in B.C. or A.D. and to come in future might get old which may not be applicable.

Law 8: Sensible philosophy can’t be identified only realized.

Any philosophy is realized after futile or fruitful attempts. Al the philosophies, in other words all those we come across are philosophies. Which we may perceive or not depends upon one’s involvement. Some philosophies like those which falls under inversely converse, at least one law is sensible philosophy.

Law 9: Materialistic world exercised well enough leads to new progressive environment.

Based upon individual’s perspective or experience which they acquired over period of time one classify or state experience as materialistic or spiritualistic world. What looks materialistic may appear as spiritualistic to some, ultimately it leads to new progressive environment. Here any poem speaks about or so-called the thought gives a new progressive environment meaning new evolution or revolution happen.

Law 10: Divine intervention and the urge to find the new object leads to victory.

At times we feel or realized divine intervention either accidentally or incidentally would have happened or occurred which leads to new art or creativity, in other words poetry which is applicable here which we can call as victory.

Law 11: Life of the ‘to be’ victorious subject and hence the new miracle.

Here the victorious subject refers to the creator or inventor. The noun “creator” comes when a “verb” poem is penned.

Law 12: “Fiction or fact “both are interchangeable.

To start with, initially in most of the cases poem referred as fiction. Later over a period of time we might feel it becomes part of life .Similarly we can take or treat that “fact” meaning both are interchangeable.

Law 13: New concept can’t impact the respective society immediately.

“Poem which we treat here as a new concept and hence can’t impact the respective society immediately. Yes over a period of time it creates an impact in the society.

Law 14: more the debate, more will be the resilience and longevity of the invention or discovery

Any art or creation has to undergo the debate. Only then corresponding invention or discovery creates everlasting existence and resilience will happen.

Law 15: Petulant or annoyed remarks are essential, which we call as critics.

Again, I keep saying annoyed remarks are always essential and then only the poem will stand firm over millennium after millennium.

Law 16: Origin of thoughts for any invention could be some cause.

Any poem needs inspiration either from inside or outside of human anatomy. Meaning without inspiration, not even a single entity either tangible or intangible occurs.

Law 17: Application of any new theory normally not predetermined in most of the cases.

Poems to start with may not have proper application. Over a period of time its usages are determined. Having said the above, without even being aware of the application some poem would have transformed.

Law 18: Exhaust or exclaimed after invention should exist.

Any invention or creativity after it is done, exhaust or exclaimed should occur. After poem penned, any poet has to undergo exclaimed or exhaustion.

Rest of the laws we can discuss later.

Law 1. Differential equation is an extension of calculus.

Law 2a. Inability to choose a tool thought the object is fit enough for the thesis.

For all scientific applications there was hardly a tool before differential equations.

Law 2b. Follow your thoughts not mind reading.

“Necessity to find a solution which crept in the mind is following your thoughts.”

Law 3a Work against work.

Differential equations depends on polynomial and analytical geometry ,which is work against work.

Law 3b Work inside work.

Differential equations are a subset of calculus and hence work inside work.

Law 4: Dirty subject and eternal discovery get coagulated to new prototype which mattered mostly and hence the disappearance of the respective subject.

Differential equation invented and innovated by many legends which I presume to be dirty subject. Differential equation is an eternal discovery. Of scientific application are concerned. It is a common fact that invented entity remain eternal and remembered for years as its impact in scientific community is huge , whereas the inventor or then subject which invented differential equation was not remembered for years.

Law 5 Manmade objects are none in the space – all are change of form or another or a new reason can be stated irrespective of etc.

Differential equation is an invented entity which is made out of other stand-alone tools like analytical geometry, trigonometry which again is made of numbers which again made out of vertical columns, because during ancient days number system was not born. Therefore differential equation as main objects which are derived from stand alone tools like trigonometry etc. And hence law 5 satisfied.

Law 6 nothing is essential all matter and their properties are intertwined and so it is never ending.

Differential equation is a matter and slope of family of curves is a property.

Law 7 Birth of space or there is nothing called aging god.

Having seen so many other applications of inversely converse till now, let us now dig into law 7 applied here in differential equation. Because here, birth of space relates to differential equation. Not only anything “over, below and above” sky is space like trees, plants, animals trigonometry, batter, wine, calculus are all part of space, hence birth of space, since no one knows birth of space, rather I would say there is not anything called aging god which means birth of differential calculus (space) not known and hence god which now I presume as god is not ageing simply because the invented entity won’t die therefore not ageing.

Law 8: Sensible philosophy can’t be identified.

True, at times some philosophies can’t be identified only realized for example differential equation is a sensible philosophy because before invention it was not identified only realized which we can corroborate by referring to the history of the respective philosophy.

Law 9 Materialistic world exercised well enough leads to new progressive environment.

Differential equation exercised by scientific community which also comes under materialistic world leads to new progressive environment meaning new giant-leaps in science.

Law 10 Divine intervention and the urge to find the new object leads to victory.

For any new invention, divine intervention was or is must and hence urges to find the new object or entity.

Law 12 Fiction or Fact both are interchangeable.

Differential equation initially was fiction later on based on its application, it becomes fact which all critics accepts unanimously.

Law 13: New concept can’t impact the respective society immediately

Very true. Right from calculus meaning differential calculus to the currently on-going discussion differential equation which impact the respective society immediately.

Law 14: More the debate more will be the resilience and longevity of the invention or discovery.

Any concept or theory to be proved and accepted, lot of debate has to be undergone, which is healthier then only resilience and longevity of the invention or discovery exists.

Law 15 Petulant or to become annoyed remarks are essential, which we call as critics which is an extension of law 14. Meaning annoyed remarks are essential which every one of us call as critics.

Law 16 Origin of thoughts for any invention could be some cause.

Law 16 has little discrepancy simply because not all thoughts, some cause but some has for differential equation whose origin of thoughts is a need of a tool for scientific application like analyzing the behavior of space bodies.

Law17. Application if any new theory normally not predetermined in most of the cases.

Very true some new concept surface in the mind of an inventor without even knowing its application. Later on some subject felt the usage of it.

Law 18. Exhaust of exclaimed after invention should exist.

After any subject which come up with new entity or invention exhaust or exclaimed would have happened.

Law 19. “Jack or all trades or master of all trades “meaning attempting to develop meta-skill leads to knowledge hunger.

As of this law19 for differential equation can be dealt later.

Law 20: Welfare to the society and hence every new creation has some creation of origin.

Well said, as of differential equation, differential and integral calculus was the origin.

Law 21: Beginning and ending of inversely converse exists only if source of space is an identified one.

Again very true, advent of differential equation not known though empirically some data given which leads to source of space is an unidentified one.

Law 22 Nature of inversely converse remains dirty and entangled one, but the ecstasy which we draw out of it is immense pleasure.

Again very very true, it needs big explanation we can discuss it later.

Law 23 and law 24 and law 25 will be explained later.

Stress management

Why we are going for a stress or why we are undergoing stress. Millenniums back life was not that much complicated. Now then fittest of the survival plays pivotal role in every one’s walk of life. Right from family management, finance management, human management to spiritual management so on and so forth.

In every day walk of life, looking at the present situation, life becomes highly competitive one. Stress is a nomenclature, rather I would say few years back stress remains jargon for common man. But now, many job competition, examination which validates one’s competency, career growth, health hazards and so many other factors are there. Money management is also not easier as it involves job, family, children education, medical checkup. Other auxiliary expenses are pilgrimage visits, abroad tours, diplomatic tours, mercantile purposes or trade visits etc.

How to manage stress using inversely converse

Before getting into it, I will briefly narrate the purpose of inversely converse. Inversely converse is not necessarily a philosophical jargon. It is in daily walk of life. My suggestion to manage stress is inversely converse.

Now then inversely converse in psychology. ”Psycho” means “mind” “Logy” means “study of”. Inversely converse has 25 laws. If one applies not necessary 25 laws still he or she can recover from stress. All laws of inversely converse can be applied in psychology as well.

Law 1. Extension of old one. This law can be very easily applied in psychology.

New developments are coming up in psychology. The subject or person who gets affected by stress can seek the guidance of psychologists.

How extension of old one?

Subject underwent a problem and psychologists suggesting a solution are a new one.

Meaning the problem is old one .Extension of old one is solution.

Law 2a: Inability to choose a tool though the object is fit enough for the thesis.

Psychologists have no concrete tool for the object’s problem, though the object is fit enough for the thesis. Meaning here object refers to a person. The problem is for any stress issues, there is no concrete tool. The probable tools effectively used in the industry are motivational speech, identifying one’s problem through counseling sessions and so on. Here the thesis refers to the person or subject or object that has undergone some kind of stress.

Law 2b : Follow your thoughts not mind reading

For stress best solution is the respective individual has to think or give a thought about stress or rather I would say the origin of it “follow his or her thoughts after which he or she can identify the core problem and come out of it instead of mind reading. Here one raises the query why mind reading, because mind reading will complicate the issues. Sometimes people call follow your thoughts, close to introspection which is not so. Understanding laws 2b i.e. follow your thoughts not mind reading requires more practice.

Law 3a: work against work.

Distress or Eustress are one typical example for law 3 a. likewise,

Law 3b work inside work.

Under stress, “distress and eustress “are classified which is work inside work.

Law 12 fiction or fact both are interchangeable.

Identifying the term stress wouldn’t have been recognized so it was fiction. Later on it become fact as it was used to identify the state of mind of any individual.

Law 13: new concept can’t impact the respective society immediately.

The word stress was not unknown to too many people. According to law 12, if we extrapolate law 12, law 13 comes into picture.

Law 10 divine intervention and the urge to find the new object leads to victory

Law 10 can’t be justified based on law 2b as well . Meaning divine intervention plays a role though medication also exists.

Law 11 life of the victorious subject and hence the new miracle

Though stress, it just played a role in one’s life and there is every chance that the respective individual becomes victorious which is a new miracle

Law 8 sensible philosophy can’t be identified one realized.

Definition of addiction:

Anything which becomes unmanageable is addiction, not necessarily drug addiction it could be knowledge addiction, food addiction, tour addiction, beverages addiction and so on. Is it wrong in getting along with addiction forever? It is not exactly wrong. Based upon how it affects society or our own well being it is measured. For example if one wants to pursue education rather, I would say, knowledge he or she has to learn and over a period of time get addicted to it. It is because of such addiction any miracle or rather I would say any invention happened, for example Marie Curie inventions used to kill cancer. During the process of invention the harmful rays killed her gradually. But that addiction is a positive one simply because the invented entity is a boon to the medical community. Similarly like what Edison did other great personalities are also hard-core addicts in pursuing knowledge. Now tell me whether it is good or bad?

Co-founder of Microsoft Corporation Bill Gates still pursues money, though he is a philanthropist. Yes too much of money is also addiction.

Coming to Saints, too much of thought about god is also addiction. Another typical example is Ramanujan, a greatest Indian mathematician was a hard core addict in coming up with new ideas, theorems and formulas in mathematics. He passed away at the age of 32.

How to come out of it? Is it possible?.

Possible by repeated practice. If one denied of something and after he achieved that he suddenly felt that his potential exploded and he want to pursue. So how he or she can stop this unstoppable pursuit of addiction. My theological reply is fate. All are predetermined like what happened to Newton, Einstein, GD Naidu, Ramanujan, Faraday and Henry Ford and so on.

At one point of time one has to think not only about his own well-being, but also about the society thereby he or she will reduce the addicted habit. The process of reducing itself is de-addiction.

For how long he or she has to reduce it .This time philosophical one simply because one has achieved to certain extent and so live for others. Which is what the Motto.’ live for others ‘Motto doesn’t mean selfless living? Keep your physical and mental strength strong.

Things will fall in place.

Conclusion:

Constant pursuing what looks initially as an alien habit and later on loved too much. During the process unable to come out of it is an addiction. When realized de-addiction begins. So after addiction, de-addiction surfaces. Now law 1 of inversely converse satisfied.

Similarly you can practice de-addiction against addiction which is work against work. It is also work inside work.

Law 2a:”inability to choose a tool though the object is fit enough for the thesis.
Meaning no proper medication to come out of any addiction completely.

Meaning there is no tangible tool though de-addiction is fit enough for thesis. Sheer will power will motivate one to come out of addiction . Though medication support you.

Law 2b: “Follow your thoughts not mind reading”

Meaning when ever thought of going after drugs, alcohol or knowledge-pursuit occurs, draw a prototype to come out of it. Mostly, as of addicts those thoughts are common. Based on situations or scenarios, it might very.

Law 1: new derivations are coming up which are extensions to the old one…

Law 2: when new concept arises and if no other tool to support the concept

Law 3a: for any invention, miracles, peace process, wars or ceremonies and political debates to become successful, following the respective individual thoughts are necessary.

Law 3b: Work inside work

Inside L – Hospital rule if many equations comes up then it is work inside work.

Law 3a: Work against work

L – Hospital rule and chain rule are Inversely Converse.

Law 4: Newton was a dirty man and calculus is eternal entity because of which till now got so many new prototypes developed by Einstein and physicists as well.

Law 5: As of now, a little philosophical thought. Sometimes invention happened because of divine intervention which comes under law 10 as well.

Law 6: calculus and their properties like for e.g. limits are intertwined.

Law 7: Big explanation needed. Tell u later.

Law 12: when calculus gave birth it was fiction after which it becomes fact.

Law 13: new concept can’t be taken by the society immediately which everyone knows .

Law 14: calculus took long Time to establish. As for any theory application is must. Sometimes it need not be required.

Law 18: once calculus invented and was accepted by contemporary mathematicians, the inventor was excited and exhausted.

Law 15: Before establishment of calculus lot of criticisms were encountered by the inventor.

Law 16: why calculus was invented? to establish a concept calculus was invented.

Law 17: Calculus was invented in 16th century. It still has wider applications which were not foreseen.

Law 14: Before calculus established it underwent lot of debates between mathematicians like who, how or was it a piracy etc.

Law 13: calculus didn’t create huge impact in the society during its initial days.

Law 23: followed till now – example is Laplace, Fourier, and many more to come….

Law 24 and law 25 will be explained later.

Newton vs. Einstein

One was an easy-goer, whereas other was not. Both were not good in wearing nice clothes. Newton most of the time was dirty during his experimentation as he was so obsessed in finding the nuances of space or nature..Whatever we prefer to call. Both were always obsessed with something from which they don’t want to come out .But Newton was way ahead of Einstein by all means, though Newton’s understanding of universe about 350 years was thrown back by Einstein.

Newton’s genius came to light or rather I would say recognized at the age of 29, whereas Einstein at the age of 26. Many do thought-experiments but it was the sheer personality of Einstein and Newton, theirs was highly rated and till now ahead of other contemporaries lived before or going to happen.

Contemporaries – living in the same period????

Why Newton was not easy-goer?

Newton was not a bright student in his initial school days and so pulled out of school by his mother and sent to farming. It was during this time he developed Windmill on his own. On seeing this, his teacher and uncle, they convinced his mother to sent him to school But was disinterested towards this and agreed later that this young budding ‘genius of geniuses’ had to take care of his needs on his own (including fees).

So Newton had to work in the student’s hostel mess and take care of fellow students by cleaning and the money he earned was used to pay his fees which made him to grow little less than a normal student. This reflected when he become faculty in Cambridge university and every now and then Hookes had to warn Newton about his suspension.

Newton Genius of Geniuses – How?

Newton never wasted time. At times he forgot to eat, sleep including bath. He was so obsessed in his research. He laid robust foundation for today’s science which is calculus and he laid unshakeable foundation in science by providing ‘Theory of Optics’. He gave the budding theory of gravitation though he secretly admitted to his closed friends that he was not able

to understand the theory of gravitation.

Till now there is only one living Scientific-god in human form in this earth which is Sir Isaac Newton.

Was Newton mentally-ill person?

Yes and no when King made Newton, President of Royal Society, he threatened his colleagues and went ahead and published his findings. He remained Royal Society President close to 3 decades meaning till his death.

How Newton was recognized?

A genius, in my understanding, should be dirty, obsessed in research of nature, mentally unstable meaning eccentric. More the genius more he is eccentric. Of course, the quantum of eccentric is a function of how much is one genius.

Newton was rewarded with positions, accolades and money poured to him. But still his contemporaries felt he was not recognized as he should have.

Newton suffered from nervous disorder again, few years after which he suffered from nervous breakdown. Records mentioned that he stopped his research work as per his friend’s suggestion following which he was made Royal Society President. He was the first scientist who was knighted followed by Chief of Royal Society. He died at the age of 87. Newton didn’t marry.

Synopsis about ‘absent – minded ‘ Prof.Albert Einstein.

Einstein a Jew and master-thought-experimenter. There were days Einstein was banished by many universities. After his specific theory of relativity he was followed by many scientific celebrities that what made him do the thought experiments so successfully. At times Einstein felt uncomfortable that he was followed in Berlin streets and so private life was disturbed.

In contrast to Newton, Einstein took his life very lightly and so sought his friend’s help which was Grossmann and arrived world famous equation. Though Einstein was also ‘scientist of scientist’ and he was the man because of whom Newton’s understanding of universe was thrown? Though I have to admit Einstein defeated Newton after 350 years, it is true that Newton remains incomparable to Einstein.

Conclusion as of now both Newton and Einstein are ‘scientist of scientist’. Needless to conclude both are also eccentric.

“Jack of all” leads to “knowledge hunger” spirally .Meaning during the course of time, knowledge and skill acquired over a indefinite period of time leads to one’s meta-skill development . How it played a role in inversely converse. It is playing a role ….but how? Jack of all and master of all are inversely converse.

There is nothing called “Master of All”. May be relatively we can call as so. It is only “Jack of all” which acts as a driving force to make our life meaningful one. Right from Aristotle to Newton to Einstein to Stephen Hawking all are jack of all – not master of all in my perception. God or any governing force believed to be controlling us ……again it is a belief which might vary from individual to individual.

No sixth sense mammal created a sand of less than a millimeter or to be precise one can convert an object from one form to another, meaning not a new creation from nowhere. So how come any subject however victorious he or she maybe can claim I am ” master of all, which I presume in absolute context.

Even an eternal entity (god), which I may conclude to some extent can’t claim he or she knows everything about his or her creations. If he or she (god) was so sure about his or her creations he or she would not have created a nature or space which means the respected so called eternal-entity is or was not mature enough as “MASTER OF ALL”.

Conclusion as of inversely converse: there is not big variation between “jack of all or master of all” relatively.

Till now no one define the origin of space. Many theories came and still to come…. and how the

Space is transforming and what we are experiencing can be conceived by our sixth sense…

Let us start with an example: Please don’t get offended as I am not in favor of religion or caste if it happened. Please apologize as the intention was not so. Let’s start.

Millenniums back… creatures created. Now let us assume first human being created …at that point of time there is no defined grammar or literature for communication… now let us start a scenario.

After the respected human being creation….and after a definite amount of time he or she might

have undergone some kind of hunger..Which could be in need of water or any solid stuff say in need of energy….or so…how he would have communicated..When there is no means of communication… so let us assume somehow they have communicated and found a solution

which is water and/or fruits. Now whether noun or verb which came to the world first…. because

thirst is an action so definitely verb. But the word is thirst made out of alphabets …so obviously it

is a noun. Let me explain….meaning verb is name and so it is noun.

Forget about noun, verb, adjective, pronoun, gerund …all came to the world after literature revolution..Which transformed periodically? So my question is leaving the word “thirst” Which one comes first. Whether noun or verb or pronoun or etc.,…I don’t think anyone has solid proof what came first as of humans are concerned ..

Now coming to god. What thought came first to god…….as of theology or science?

Alfred Nobel invented dynamite to break small mounds or big rocks to pulverize? Or demolish old buildings. Dynamite was predominately used in World War -1 and Alfred Nobel was criticized though his invention was not meant for that purpose.

Having said the above, Alfred Nobel realized his name would be imprinted as a devil personality in history – so he formed a trust and whatever the sum which his factories made out of selling dynamites and other inventions would be spent to the society for service rendered by personalities in various fields like Medicine, Peace, Literature , Chemistry and Physics. That way his image was not tarnished as it would have been.

Prof.Albert Einstein

Coming to Prof.Albert Einstein he invented world famous equation though he did not win Nobel prize for the above. It was Photo Electric Effect which won the Nobel Prize in physics in the year 1921.

When Adolf Hitler became Dictator of Germany, Prof.Einstein moved from Germany to United States of America and became faculty member in Institute of advanced study in Princeton University. As the professor was a Jew and he sensed the treatment which Hitler conspired against the Jewish community. During Einstein’s stay in United States of America, he received a letter from one of his contemporary scientist who stayed in Germany that Germany was going to come up with nuclear weapon. If it happened, Herr. Hitler would use against rest of the world. So Prof.Einstein wrote a letter to Mr. Franklin D Roosevelt who was President of America that World his facing the threat if Germany invents Nuclear Weapon.

After Pearl – Harbor disaster imposed by Japan during world war -2, United States decided to test the Nuclear weapon against Japan in the year 1945 when World War – 2 came to an end . So they dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many people died and after even six decades the after-effect is still there. The radiation of the bomb affected the new born kids.

After hearing the news that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was tested using Nuclear Bombs, Einstein become crestfallen and from then on he wrote letters to many apex- authorities in many countries that nuclear weapon should not be encouraged.

Now can we say it is because of Prof.Albert Einstein that after-effect of world war – 2 and Alfred Nobel for world war – 1 was pathetic?

Conclusion as of Inversely Converse:

One (Alfred Nobel) responsible for the formation of Nobel Prize Committee, which is the highest prize in this Universe and another (Prof.Albert Einstein) received Nobel Prize in the year 1921 have played key role in world wars ???. I leave the audience whoever read this post to decide whether they fall under the title of this blog which is Inversely Converse in many perceptions.

THEOREM : “PHENOMENON WAS THE FIRST THOUGHT OF GOD ,NOT PRINCIPLE”

RECAP BEFORE PROOF: Before taking a plunge in to “ FIRST THOUGHT OF GOD “ just a recap of inversely converse . I framed not formed all those laws. Work against work is inversely converse to work inside work. Though I say for work inside work , typical example in calculus , I can also convince it also satisfies work against work. How differential calculus and integral calculus are work against work. It also satisfies work inside work.

When calculus was invented by newton , the domain known to mathematicians were calculus and whatever new concept came all belongs to calculus domain which are sub-domains and hence differential calculus and integral calculus both are sub-domains. Meaning both the invented entities satisfies work inside work. But differential and integral calculus has every justification to call themselves as work against work.

Conclusion or inference of the description says :

“work against work and work inside work are inversely converse to each other.”

What more examples you need? Now let me explain the above laws in literature as well.

Shakespeare and Thiruvalluvar are inversely converse to each other. What Shakespeare did to English literature and what Thiruvalluvar did to Tamil literature are inversely converse to each other.

Though both lived in different literature era , yet they still can be cited as an example. Work against work satisfied as because their works are in different languages . Also satisfies work inside work as because their works are in horizontal literature which may be English, tamil , Germany, French, spain, chinese, japan, etc.,.

Above shakespeare and thiruvalluvar also satisfies law 1 with solid proof meaning “extension of old one”. Coming to law 2a, inability to choose a tool though the object is fit enough for the thesis. How ? the works written by poet for example by thiruvalluvar was thirukural . Those days the alphabets were in different shapes not like the present scenario. So it was difficult for the modern readers to understand the entities which were composed by the poet. Meaning the object here was tirukural and there was not a tool to understand tirukural which were the intended thesis.

Coming to law 2b: follow your thoughts not mind reading. Thiruvalluvar composed poems . was it out of his own thoughts or was mind reading was involved in it. Who knows ? Because thiruvalluvar was a premier legend and whatever experience he gathered over a period of time was composed as poems. So to my perception , mind reading was not involved. But on the other hand , unintentionally mind reading would have happened . meaning law 2b failed as of thiruvalluvar’s perspective .

I have a contradiction over here . we cant always follow our own thoughts at sometimes intentionally or unintentionally we have to go for mind reading based on the individual’s experience. At this juncture , I would like to quote one typical suggestion which is ,though inversely converse is a space philosophy that is not absolute here . In my opinion “ABSOLUTE” is a misnomer not necessarily in inversely converse but also in other worldly example as well. It appears that the word absolutely and relatively are inversely converse . Having undergone so much of discussion in inversely converse there is nothing called good and bad or absolutely and relatively or win and loss or awake and sleep. Well the example looks contradictory . we need all those vocabularies to establish the proper communication. But as of inversely converse they are just extension. In this planet or space ,nothing is absolute . All are relatively established fact. What is good for some object may be bad for some object . It all depends on under what perception or what dimension the object gets influenced.

Again law 1 and law 3a and law 3b are inversely converse to each other. I mentioned in my prior discussion that law 1 and law 2 are similar to protons and neutrons in nucleus and rest of the laws are similar to electrons which travel in orbits. Similarly law 3a and law 3b are in nucleus and rest of the laws travels in orbits like electrons . similarly law 2a and law 2b are in nucleus and rest of then laws travels in orbits like electrons.

Lets talks about law 4: dirty subject and eternal discovery get coagulated to new prototype which mattered mostly and hence the disappearance of the respective subject.

Here the subject or the inventor is a work . The invented prototype or entity is also a work. How the so called inventor’s creation comes out of his/her brain . Again not only from his brain but also from the external influences. For the time being lets not take that external influence into consideration. My conclusion as of law 4 , within law 4 work against work and work inside work exists . how ? inventor is a work and the invented entity is also a work. So it satisfies work against work and also work inside work.

To understand law 4 , now we move to the different vertical , which is an entertainment industry which is movie making business. Here story is the backbone . Again relatively , it varies from perception to perception. The characters in movie says the positive hero and the negative hero are inversely converse. It is true that both characters satisfies inversely converse. Now the thought of villain or negative hero at one point of time disturb the hero’s thought and hence either physical or mental altercation happens . Let us consider here ,the thoughts of positive hero alone satisfies work inside work . Also it satisfies work against work. For any creature , both good and bad thoughts occur . But based upon the circumstances he or she entity may be portrayed as anti-social elements to the respective community. It could be animal community or insect community or reptile community. It could be vertebrate or invertebrate.

What is my objective of inversely converse?

KEEP THIS PLANET A PEACEFUL ONE . AGAIN RELATIVELY , NOT ABSOLUTELY. BECAUSE FOR ANY CREATION END HAS TO COME .

Now lets talk about the birth of space. Are we getting civilized . Meaning many civilizations happened and so we are getting civilized . But there were days, to kill a person one has to travel miles . Now just by pressing a button the missile hit the intended city and hence the whole city demolished . Are we getting civilized ?.Jjust be wearing nice attire and flawless communication doesn’t meaning we are getting civilized . To understand the space lot of space agency works tirelessly .In order to understand the birth of space and where the space travelling scientists dedicate their life . Yes the space is travelling.

JUST To understand the “BIRTH OF SPACE “ lot of new developments are coming up daily . meaning what ? Just to understand the birth of space , science still developing. Then what about the life of the space . For which we need further development in science . Again inversely converse or converse inversely ,both are same. Meaning all along I keep saying inversely converse.

PROOF : “PHENOMENON WAS THE FIRST OF GOD NOT PRINCIPLE”

NOW let us come to the topic of discussion. Every human brain has right and left part. I also mentioned like left and right brain , FIRST THOUGHT GOD IS MADE OUT OF “PRINCIPLE AND PHENOMENON” . Now what is principle or phenomenon . Both are same. Meaning both principle and phenomenon are inversely converse or converse inversely to each other. If one has principle alone there will not be new developments . Can principle or phenomenon exists individually. No they are plaited concept. Like good and bad. Little good is too bad for some one else . just above little good is still more bad for same person. Just below little good is good for same person.

Space is made out of phenomenon, as of humans are concerned. If so inversely converse is just a phenomenon Or space is just a principle . Either principle is a misnomer or phenomenon is a misnomer. For all practical purposes , space is just a phenomenon and it obeys all laws of inversely converse.

I arrive this conclusion because humans come up with new opinion or new invention or war declaration or political debate etc.,. only after having undergone constructive thoughts. So as of humans , phenomenon is first and principle comes after it . for which I don’t need to give example . yet let me give simple and generic example .Any new invention or theories after “ TRIAL AND ERROR” . Most new invention gives birth which is a unanimously accepted as phenomenon. Subsequently principles are framed or formed . so it is very obvious “ first god of thought is phenomenon” not principle considering the fact that god is also sixth sense mammal.

END OF FIRST THOUGHT OF GOD DISCUSSION AS OF INVERSELY CONVERSE:

The statues carved out of rocks in temple reveals “god/GOD” exists in human form ?????????? SO PHENOMENON WAS/IS THE FIRST THOUGHT OF GOD .

**** WAS/IS : considering the fact or fiction, the duration of first thought of god/GOD may not over yet.***

(law 12 of inversely converse: FICTION OR FACT , BOTH ARE INTERCHANGEABLE.)